After Thanksgiving
Nov. 29th, 2006 02:27 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Where did the time go? I didn't even get a chance to use any of the Thanksgiving icons I grabbed recently. (And I didn't get anywhere near enough turkey at the big dinner, whine, bitch, moan, whine, maybe I'll have to make my own, sigh...) But I did make a kickass fresh cranberry sauce, for which I may later post a recipe.
Winter seems to have finally arrived, after a long spell of summer-like weater - the air right now is crisp and cold, with that hard, clear feel you only get around this time of year, blue sky straight up into space. The kind of weather that makes you feel shivery and glad you have bulky coat to put on - brrrr. To really drive home the wintry feeling, Toys and I have been sick since Sunday - the three-year-old niece was just coming off a cold, so of course we both caught it - and are sniffling and snorking and trying to shake it off. Hot apple cider and super-spicy Chinese food to the rescue. So far, so good.
I missed at least one birthday over the holidays:
So much catching up to do. I may spam a bit today.
R.I.P. Dave Cockrum, X-Men Comic Artist
Dave Cockrum, the artist who created the visual appearances of the "New X-Men" - in other words, the characters we see in the movies today - back in the 1970s when the comic was revamped by Len Wein, died this last Saturday after a long bout of illness at the age of 63. Cockrum was, to say the least, an influential artist for the era: he created Wildfire for the Legion of Super Heroes, Nightcrawler and Thunderbird and Storm and the Starjammers for the X-Men - they all owe their looks to Big Dave. It's Cockrum we have to thank for that late-'70s-early-'80s trend of women in unitards with thigh-high boots and waist sashes (Phoenix, for the biggest example), and he was the artist working on The X-Men when I first started picking it up, back during the first Brood storyline. Yes, the Brood were a ripoff of Alien, but that was also the kind of cracking good story that got people addicted to the X-Men, and through it, I developed a real affection for Cockrum's art, its in-your-face straightforwardness. Cockrum was a bit like Jolly Jack Kirby in a lot of ways: the same way you can quickly identify a Kirby drawing not just for its energy, but for the uniqueness of personal vision, Cockrum's characters were clearly his, musuclar action men and women doing exciting stuff. Even when they stood around, they were larger than life. We'll miss you, Big Dave.
And I gotta say - I'm really displeased by the tone of the CNN story (a little crass, methinks, to lead off with a headline that makes the deceased out to be some kind of Underoos-wearing manchild, jeszus), but Marvel has a story up, and I was pleased to see that some kind of settlement will be making life a little easier for his family, given that he's never received any kind of royalties for his X-Men designs. (Not that isn't typical for comics work - it's just one of those sad facts of the industry, that more often that not, the people most responsible for creating that which brings us joy tend to be the least rewarded by it... monetarily, anyway.) The comics blogsverse is still gathering its reactions; this one also includes a link to a sad post by a personal friend) but here's a nice bio with some gallery links to his work on Blackhawk that really gives a feel for Cockrum's style.
The funniest thing I've seen so far this week:
Will Wheaton's short review of Open Water. I'm not sure what made me laugh more, the review itself (which is pretty damn funny) or its closing line, which is quite the mental picture. (Actually, that's not true - I know which made me laugh more.) I really admire Wil, I swear - he's such a honest-to-goodness GEEK in a way that makes me feel proud to be one of the tribe. And if you've never looked at his blog, his retro reminiscences of '80s nerd entertainments, such as video games and the hot!hot!hot! comics of the time, at least read his snarky reveiws of Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes, complete with his own behind-the-scenes notes as the guy who played Wesley Crusher.
The funniest thing I saw the week before last (Thanksgiving being a lost weekend of sorts):
An entry over on
entrenouse88's journal of good-natured snarky commentary on the subject of one of those unutterably tacky man-slut shirts that the Marsters likes to wear. Which, though, I have to note...
Now, while I wholeheartedly agree that JM's taste in clothing is atrocious (I don't really follow the actor stuff, but one can't help but notice from the occasional photo that the man seems to still have the clothes closet of a 17-year-old - albeit with better-than-usual body-confidence - who practices guitar licks in the family rec room), the mirth that was directed at his scanty little sample of chest hair in the thread provoked my awwwww, cute reaction instead, because that happens to be a trait he shares with my husband, Toys. And sue me, everything about Toys is cute. So JM gets a cute rating for his chest squiggles by association. : D
Branching out of my fanfic reading niche?
How weird! Lately, nearly everything I've read has been either Spander, such as
cordelianne's It's Not and
shadowscast's Sock Puppet (which is not only a cracking good post-series vision of the universe and characters, but had me bawling like a baby at the end - it's that intense, folks!), and the stories in the Buffy/Angel-centric I Will Remember You ficathon, run by
chrisleeoctaves. I've been terrible on feedback for all of these, but I've definitely been reading and enjoying, and sort of wondering about the varying tones of post-series stories, depending on pairing.
So far, here's the general impression I'm getting: post-series Spuffy tends to be lighter, more adventurey with a lean toward the domestic; post-series Spander starts angsty and broken but then turns domestic; post-series Bangel is just plain angsty with a side order of sex; and post-series Spangel is... almost any of those, usually with angsty served up front, and a kind of brittle, distance-y tension. But the feel of dystopia in nearly all those futures - except for Spuffy, for some reason! - really intrigues me. Other thoughts and observations welcome - this one's really an interesting puzzle for me. Is this the real root, say, of the post-series drift into more slash (that's my impression, anyway, that slash has become more popular in relation to the het stuff), because the het couplings seemed to either be trending toward static happiness or equally static final separation? I'm wondering.
Winter seems to have finally arrived, after a long spell of summer-like weater - the air right now is crisp and cold, with that hard, clear feel you only get around this time of year, blue sky straight up into space. The kind of weather that makes you feel shivery and glad you have bulky coat to put on - brrrr. To really drive home the wintry feeling, Toys and I have been sick since Sunday - the three-year-old niece was just coming off a cold, so of course we both caught it - and are sniffling and snorking and trying to shake it off. Hot apple cider and super-spicy Chinese food to the rescue. So far, so good.
I missed at least one birthday over the holidays:
So much catching up to do. I may spam a bit today.
R.I.P. Dave Cockrum, X-Men Comic Artist
Dave Cockrum, the artist who created the visual appearances of the "New X-Men" - in other words, the characters we see in the movies today - back in the 1970s when the comic was revamped by Len Wein, died this last Saturday after a long bout of illness at the age of 63. Cockrum was, to say the least, an influential artist for the era: he created Wildfire for the Legion of Super Heroes, Nightcrawler and Thunderbird and Storm and the Starjammers for the X-Men - they all owe their looks to Big Dave. It's Cockrum we have to thank for that late-'70s-early-'80s trend of women in unitards with thigh-high boots and waist sashes (Phoenix, for the biggest example), and he was the artist working on The X-Men when I first started picking it up, back during the first Brood storyline. Yes, the Brood were a ripoff of Alien, but that was also the kind of cracking good story that got people addicted to the X-Men, and through it, I developed a real affection for Cockrum's art, its in-your-face straightforwardness. Cockrum was a bit like Jolly Jack Kirby in a lot of ways: the same way you can quickly identify a Kirby drawing not just for its energy, but for the uniqueness of personal vision, Cockrum's characters were clearly his, musuclar action men and women doing exciting stuff. Even when they stood around, they were larger than life. We'll miss you, Big Dave.
And I gotta say - I'm really displeased by the tone of the CNN story (a little crass, methinks, to lead off with a headline that makes the deceased out to be some kind of Underoos-wearing manchild, jeszus), but Marvel has a story up, and I was pleased to see that some kind of settlement will be making life a little easier for his family, given that he's never received any kind of royalties for his X-Men designs. (Not that isn't typical for comics work - it's just one of those sad facts of the industry, that more often that not, the people most responsible for creating that which brings us joy tend to be the least rewarded by it... monetarily, anyway.) The comics blogsverse is still gathering its reactions; this one also includes a link to a sad post by a personal friend) but here's a nice bio with some gallery links to his work on Blackhawk that really gives a feel for Cockrum's style.
The funniest thing I've seen so far this week:
Will Wheaton's short review of Open Water. I'm not sure what made me laugh more, the review itself (which is pretty damn funny) or its closing line, which is quite the mental picture. (Actually, that's not true - I know which made me laugh more.) I really admire Wil, I swear - he's such a honest-to-goodness GEEK in a way that makes me feel proud to be one of the tribe. And if you've never looked at his blog, his retro reminiscences of '80s nerd entertainments, such as video games and the hot!hot!hot! comics of the time, at least read his snarky reveiws of Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes, complete with his own behind-the-scenes notes as the guy who played Wesley Crusher.
The funniest thing I saw the week before last (Thanksgiving being a lost weekend of sorts):
An entry over on
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Now, while I wholeheartedly agree that JM's taste in clothing is atrocious (I don't really follow the actor stuff, but one can't help but notice from the occasional photo that the man seems to still have the clothes closet of a 17-year-old - albeit with better-than-usual body-confidence - who practices guitar licks in the family rec room), the mirth that was directed at his scanty little sample of chest hair in the thread provoked my awwwww, cute reaction instead, because that happens to be a trait he shares with my husband, Toys. And sue me, everything about Toys is cute. So JM gets a cute rating for his chest squiggles by association. : D
Branching out of my fanfic reading niche?
How weird! Lately, nearly everything I've read has been either Spander, such as
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So far, here's the general impression I'm getting: post-series Spuffy tends to be lighter, more adventurey with a lean toward the domestic; post-series Spander starts angsty and broken but then turns domestic; post-series Bangel is just plain angsty with a side order of sex; and post-series Spangel is... almost any of those, usually with angsty served up front, and a kind of brittle, distance-y tension. But the feel of dystopia in nearly all those futures - except for Spuffy, for some reason! - really intrigues me. Other thoughts and observations welcome - this one's really an interesting puzzle for me. Is this the real root, say, of the post-series drift into more slash (that's my impression, anyway, that slash has become more popular in relation to the het stuff), because the het couplings seemed to either be trending toward static happiness or equally static final separation? I'm wondering.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 10:34 pm (UTC)Sad to hear about Dave Cockrum. I began reading the new X-Men just after he finished his first stint on the book and John Byrne took over. I collected all his issues, though and liked his style a lot. A very influential comics artist.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 11:24 pm (UTC)But it's such a whole different vibe, the angsty B/A. I'm still trying to put my finger on it. The best theory I've got so far is that B/A tends to be overshadowed by this air of fatalism - this thing is bigger than both of us, baby - that B/S typically doesn't have. It doesn't need to make sense, or even make the characters happy. It just IS. And it makes for some fascinating fic, even if it's not my personal kink.
I'm really sad about Dave. Too young! And that anecedote I read about him crying at the X-Men screening out of sheer emotion and happiness to see those characters on the big screen... like, damn. He'll be missed.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 07:06 pm (UTC)Maybe it's something to do with that whole eternal love of champions thing? Not my cup of tea at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 03:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 06:59 pm (UTC)Maybe that makes Spuffy 'shippers more determined to up the fluff quotient?
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 03:43 pm (UTC)The eternal love thing is very much a B/A thing, as you say. I find it all a bit silly.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 06:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 07:39 pm (UTC)DeKnight & Goddard did tend to get hopelessly fanboyish and silly (tearing down iconic characters a speciality) when they wrote together, and I'm not that keen on the results.
However, I prefer TGiQ to WWF, if only becuase in TGiQ Angel is the one who ends up looking stupid whereas in WWF it's Spike (and in fact he looks especially stupid in everything Goddard wrote).
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 08:33 pm (UTC)But... yeah, TGiQ. I didn't get as much pleasure out of Angel being the butt of jokes as I would've liked, because the heart of that episode was just so mean. Hey, let's make fun of these two dolts for their big, tragic, hopeless love! Aren't they funny? That hurt. Especially because I also couldn't help but feel that I, as a viewer, was included in that joke - hey, let's make fun of these dolts in the audience who actually cared about all that big, tragic, hopelesss love stuff! Aren't they funny? Arrrrghh..
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-04 02:41 pm (UTC)That's why I'm very glad indeed that SMG couldn't do the 100th episode of AtS (aside from the fact that leaving Cordy permanently in a coma would have been awful) because having that story, with Spike made to look especially stupid due to Lindsey and Eve's machinations, be the Spike/Buffy reunion episode would have been just awful.
As more of a Spangel 'shipper, I could cope with TGiQ, though I agree, there's a definite stompy-footedness on the writers' part to it.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 11:05 pm (UTC)Most of the spuffy onscreen was painfull, deep, dark, with them hurting, and quite often, them (accidentally or not) hurting one another.
I think it's the fact that we saw so much of it onscreen, that makes a lot of spuffy authors inclined to write more positive stories, because after all the pain we already got, there's this need to finally see them happy.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 11:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 11:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-29 11:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 12:43 am (UTC)I can't comment on B/A because I just don't read any of it. And not much of fan of Spangel or Spander either although I did read
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 01:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 03:44 am (UTC)Whereas with both B/A and S/A, the angst is usually the end, not the means. Angel is the world's biggest fatalist; he's not going to try to solve his relationship issues. He'll just suffer through them.
S/X seems to attract writers who have a kink for H/C.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 01:22 am (UTC)Whereas with both B/A and S/A, the angst is usually the end, not the means. Angel is the world's biggest fatalist; he's not going to try to solve his relationship issues. He'll just suffer through them.
Yeah, I think this is definitely key. Anything dealing with Angel seems to involve a little masochism on the side of the other person, be it Buffy or Spike or whoever, unless I'm reading it wrong.
S/X seems to attract writers who have a kink for H/C.
Boy-howdy, does it! Or buddy-buddy schmoop, I guess, although that shows up in every pairing.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-30 12:54 pm (UTC)There is a lot of angst in this year's marathon- I don't think there was as much as this last year. I am an optomistic B/A shipper. As a reader I would like to think that a la 'Chosen' Buffy and Angel will find each other somewhere down the road and have a chance to find some sort of happiness; as a writer, I prefer to write them as hurt(ing) and damaged and struggling. Because I am a masochist...and enjoy the emotional pain.
I can't speak for B/S writers or stories because while I do read them, I probably don't read enough to comment. But there are lots of happily-ever-after B/A stories out there. Often they are all human fics- which is not my cup of tea- and often they are 'we got it all wrong, we should be together, let's shag' fics.
I'm rambling, I'm sorry- it's early.
Frankly, I am not sure any Jossverse character has the potential to be happy in the long run. I want them to be. But I want them to be alive and whole, too...and let's face it- Joss did too good a job banging them up.
I am going away now because I clearly have nothing of value to say.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 01:26 am (UTC)I think this is why I've always enjoyed your B/A fics - you never scrimp on the difficulties of who and what they are. But I was surprised to see so many other writers on that same wavelength this year! Not to mention all the fics that dealt directly with Spike, even to the point of writing from his POV. Unexpected, that.
I can't speak for B/S writers or stories because while I do read them, I probably don't read enough to comment. But there are lots of happily-ever-after B/A stories out there. Often they are all human fics- which is not my cup of tea- and often they are 'we got it all wrong, we should be together, let's shag' fics.
Probably the same in both camps, then. : )
I am going away now because I clearly have nothing of value to say.
Oh, puh-lease, sweetie! This is exactly the sort of stuff I was looking for. And you always have something of value to say.
(I"m using my Angel icon just because I love his "grrr")
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-03 01:29 am (UTC)