thedeadlyhook: (zerograpic_AnyaHeroine)
thedeadlyhook ([personal profile] thedeadlyhook) wrote2004-04-06 11:01 am

The Pain That I Feel...

This grew out of a response I began writing to [livejournal.com profile] azdak on the previous post, as a continuation of the discussion there, but it got long. We'd begun talking about that final Spike/Buffy moment in "Chosen," the "I love you" moment, and the validity of how it was presented, and I had a number of emotional things to say there.

This was the original quotation that got me writing:

(azdak says)
There are a lot of things about Chosen that I dislike, but the Spike/Buffy moment isn't one of them. I'm sure it helps that I didn't feel jerked about by the relationship prior to that point (and I didn't feel that it was inconsistent in S6 either), so I didn't get that 'So now I'm supposed to believe she loves him?' reaction. It seems to me that prior to S7 Buffy's feelings for Spike were always stronger than she was prepared to admit (even to herself), that the AR obviously throws a huge wrench in the works, and that in S7 she does, indeed, care about him more than anyone else, without this necessarily implying that he's the one she wants to be with for the rest of her life. She loves him, but not in the way he wants, or not enough. She's incredibly proud of him, and she trusts him (beyond the point where she's entirely rational about it - see the whole unchaining him while he's still triggered argument), she believes he can truly become a good man, and all of that is love, plus there's sexual attraction in there as well; but if it came down to a straightforward choice between spending her life with Spike or with Angel, I don't think she'd choose Spike. Doesn't mean he isn't in her heart; it's perfectly possible to love two men, even if you love one more than the other. I do agree, though, that that goodbye is far more about Spike than it is about Buffy.


There's a large part of me, the soft, Spuffy part, that agrees with this. To be absolutely honest, I'd thought she was in love with him in S6. And I saw her do a lot of things in S7 that consistently supported that. But...

Given that reading, Buffy-in-love, even figuring in their horrible history and "Seeing Red" et al, I couldn't explain why she never said as much to him in the lead-up to the end. In "Touched," in "End of Days," she listens to a couple of the most heartbreaking speeches ever from him and just lets them go with the barest of comments. Then we have that confusing scene with Angel, then she's back with Spike, acting like she cares.

So while I can do the work myself to wrench this into a shape I can live with (she loves him but doesn't necessarily want to settle down with him, etc., as per above), I resent that I have to, that it wasn't explicitly spelled out for me, what she feels. Buffy's reactions in those last three episodes seemed to be more about setting up the plot arc for Spike, to establish that he's willing to die for this woman whether she loves him or not.

...and from his perspective, it really does look like not. She passes up moment after moment when she could have come clean and told him her feelings, whatever they were, and lets it go, all during a point in time where any of them could die the next day, the next moment. Spike lives through those days without holding back - he says what he feels and he stays on the track he set himself on in getting the soul and coming back to Buffy to make his amends.

Buffy, on the other hand, holds back. On the edge of the end, she doesn't say anything, doesn't share this feeling with him, even though it was him telling her such things in "Touched" that gave her the strength to go on. She doesn't share that strength - she asks him to go forward with nothing, alone, to be strong in ways that she herself can't be. She wants to be "just a girl"; she asks him to be superhuman.

So that moment of goodbye that they share, in "Chosen"... it's heartbreaking to me because even if they seem together, as one, for that instant, with the flaring of fire and two souls meeting... they're really still so far apart. Buffy in that moment saying "I love you" and meaning it and thinking this is the perfect time and thing to say for their final goodbye... and him with that sad smile that says everything to me about what she doesn't understand.

Because in that moment we are seeing Spike, dying, for love... and for him love has been all about living, something that you do every day, with and for the one you love - it is life. But for Buffy, apparently, love is something you put off until some future time when you are ready for it, when you're fully baked and feel like accepting or giving it - it's a present. When she's "done" someone will "enjoy" her. So we have this man that's been in her life for years, who actually had it right in "Wrecked" when he told her he was already in her life - although somehow that was pitched to be a bad thing - and who she's kept at arm's length until the very moment of his death to say so, and we're told that she, Buffy, never had it backwards about what love is or isn't. It breaks my heart, and I can't be happy with Buffy in that moment, because when she finally says it, it's like she's giving him a present, a going-away gift. He's been telling her he loves her for years, and showing her with actions that have literally on occasion turned him inside out, and what she gives him in return is this - a statement that he has to struggle against all logic to believe. I would have much rather heard her say something in that moment that felt real to them both, that had no doubts attached to it, that would have felt right - "you were my best friend" or "I forgive you."

And I'm actually fucking tearing up writing this. God, I really am in a melancholy mood.

What got me, ulitmately, about the Buffy/Spike story, is that it ended up being one about despair. It wasn't about life-affirming nature of love - how could it be, when Buffy rejects love constantly with the idea that somehow this makes her a stronger fighter? It wasn't even about how how love can make you a better person - although that message is indeed in there, with Spike's remaking of himself, although he was required to turn into Jesus Christ before this was even faintly acknowledged. We see Buffy deny Spike's definition of real love as something "wild and passionate and dangerous," and yet the only times she sees fit to reward him for his love for her are in the aftermath of these sorts of moments, when he does something huge and painful and passionate for her, when he's broken and falling apart and dying. Then she can say it. Then we can see it in her eyes.

But for the guy who was willing to babysit her sister, fight alongside her every day, put up with her friends that he doesn't like, abide by her rules if she ever bothered to set them? She hasn't got a word for that man. That's the one she leaves waiting in her basement for when such time she deigns to visit, that she can forget about when she chooses to flirt around with others (whilst giving him the steely-eyed glare at the faintest suggestion him doing the same). She doesn't want to hear about how he could change for her, even while she insists that he does, that he go against his very nature constantly. She manages to be disappointed in him no matter what he does - act like a demon, act like a man, be good to her, be bad to her. She never figures out for herself what she does want from him, only punishes him for not being it, whatever it was.

I objected to that. I objected to the story of Buffy/Spike being one of hopeless surrender - that the only way he could prove his love for her was real was to give up every last thing about himself, do exactly as she told him, become a tame animal that jumped at her command. To Buffy, perhaps, this looked like love because it fit her life perfectly - he was there when she needed him, and didn't bother her when she didn't - but I think to every other human being in the world, it looked like what Buffy essentially wanted was a subservient wife, a First Lady, a "mission's boyfriend" that had no demands of his own. This is ultimately what broke up her relationship with Riley, her unwillingness to share the burdens and let him be part of her whole life (sue me, I'm one of those people who actually liked the Riley arc). In "As You Were," we saw Riley's "perfect" relationship as a team of equals. Buffy, we never saw reach for anything like that, although she surely could have. Because Spike was, or could have been, her equal - her adversary and opposite who'd changed from wanting to kill her to wanting to love her. There could have been a story there of how love transforms you and lifts you up, helps you see into places that used to be dark, but it ended up being being how-to manual on crushing spirits. Hers, because she couldn't quite figure out how to treat this one unusual vampire like a human being, his because that was his path, to be her sacrificial animal.

So even if she loved him the whole time, and there is a part of me that sort of believes that she did, I still can't take much comfort. She refused to share it, refused to give as well as receive. We saw him give to her, give everything, give the whole world for her, and whether she loved him or not had by that point become really irrelevant. We were given an ending in which Spike understood love and what it meant - giving to others - and Buffy sure as hell didn't.

God, I'm sad now. Pardon me while I go cry.

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/automatedalice_/ 2004-04-21 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
i came to this post through someone else's link. & you've got me almost crying at work. i too, am a sucker for spike, and feel passionately that his story was a lot more interesting & a lot closer to to the message that ME thought it was giving with buffy.

as clunky as the cookie-dough metaphor was, it's really important. but i think ME handled it in the wrong way. the focus for ME has always seemed to be doneness. for me, and for so many viewers (particularly rabid spike fans), it's about process rather than product. it's about the baking. the things that you go through while you're baking, how you get baked (no pun intended), etc. are much more important than the warm & delicious cookie you that comes out in the end. i couldn't care less about the cookie. process is why spike is fascninating, why buffy was fascinating when she was struggling with herself & admitting to struggle (rather than playing little general). it's why faith is such a good character.

the more that i look at buffy & look at S6 & S7, the more i say "damn, that girl could use some therapy." because no one is ever done. she'll never be done, especially if she holds herself back from loving, because love is part of the process. & spike's love, whether she admits it or not, is something that buoyed buffy through several seasons & eventually helped her get her shit sort of together.

and even though i think that she meant the "i love you" in her own way as a quick (& pretty right) way to sum up all her feelings about spike, i think that she admitted it because it was the end for him. he was "done," which meant that buffy could make her statement. and i think that kind of ending or doneness makes someone worthy in ME's eyes.

i've always found ME's concept of feminism pretty troubling & i find their concept of growing up troubling as well. growing & changing never stops. if you let your monsters become human (& buffy's a monster as well, in her own way), you have to let them continue to grow & change, which means they need to be able to love. in not allowing this for spike, & not really allowing it for buffy, ME failed their own characters and their audience. both buffy & spike deserved better than that, whether they were together or not.

pt. 2

[identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/automatedalice_/ 2004-04-21 09:18 am (UTC)(link)
but with spike's arc from S2 - S7, we actually see someone grow & change & embrace their difference & their sameness & their relationships to other people. from a therapeutic point of view (yeah, i'm in therapy), this is really healthy. one of ME's purported messages was "be what you are, challenge our demons, take things head on, be in command of your own ship," etc. spike does this. ME always thought they were doing it with buffy, showing her as a flawed heroine, etc., but what we see in the end is buffy pantomiming this message while she's still choosing "doneness" & denying the process that will get her there. spike embraces the process, keeps growing & changing, & recognizes at some point that at any given time, he's "done" for that time. what's "done" today may be process for tomorrow, & that's OK.

& if ME had admitted this, or let buffy really go in this direction, rather than hemming & hawwing about cookie-dough, essentially saying that she's still not good enough for anything or anyone, ME would have succeeded in their mission. spike's journey is a lot more about girl-power than buffy's ever was, even though it's a journey of terrible brutality & sacrifice.

Re: pt. 2

[identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com 2004-04-21 09:45 am (UTC)(link)
God, god, god. This is really good stuff. I'll have more to say in reply a bit later, but I have to run off to work today, so my LJ time is a bit limited. But yes, that's exactly the issue I had with where Buffy was left for us - as someone who needs to reach some unspecified state of perfection before she's ready to behave humanely. Worse, it's as if we were being told Buffy's "hero" status was a good enough excuse for her to follow different rules than everyone else. The idea of "doneness," that you ever actually finish your journey, strikes me as so naive I don't even know how to approach it... it's why I can't feel comfortable with the character of Buffy, post-series, because we didn't really see her learning anything other than how to be the boss and make sure your subordinates fall in line.

Growth and Change

[identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com 2004-04-21 01:46 pm (UTC)(link)
it's about process rather than product. it's about the baking. the things that you go through while you're baking, how you get baked (no pun intended), etc. are much more important than the warm & delicious cookie you that comes out in the end.

Yes. Yes. That was exactly my issue. I'd approached S7 with the sure conviction that this is what we'd see happen with Buffy during the course of the season - we'd see her arrive at the realization that the world can't be viewed as a string of problems with ultimate solutions (e.g., "Help." "Selfness,") that it's not as simple as Punish the Bad and Reward the Good. Because a) bad and good sometimes blur, and b) harsh standards of morality can't ever be absolute when it comes to human feelings. Wasn't that what she realized about Angel, with her sobbing about being unable to stop loving him in 'Amends," despite everything he'd done to her? (Incidentally, I'd always wondered about "Never Leave Me," how much of parallel we were meant to draw to that scene.)

I'd had a theory about S7 early on that revolved around this idea. The setup for it had actually been excellent - Buffy is surrounded by people who have made bad choices, but are trying to atone (Spike, Willow, Anya, Xander, even Andrew). I figured she'd realize an emotional truth building on S2's "I Only Have Eyes for You," about forgiveness being what people "need," not what they deserve. I expected to see Buffy realizing that forgiving any of these people in her life was what she needed, even more than they needed to hear it from her. I thought the season would be about her learning that yeah, love is pain, but it's pain that's worth it, that it does make one stronger.

But her choices during the season refuted that idea. Love is apparently a leisure activity, not one that bolsters you when you need it the most... or rather, it does, but apparently a one-sided parasitic relationship is okay because of her so-so important job as the "lone leader." Only, if she'd just stop alienting herself (as per her own rant in "Touched") she wouldn't be so alone. But then next ep? Back to the alone thing again. So no lesson learned there at all. ("Touched" was actually the beginning of the end of the season for me - I just couldn't believe my eyes with that scene showing that Buffy has left Spike to wake up alone, just like Angel left her on the best night of Buffy's life. This is progress?)

she'll never be done, especially if she holds herself back from loving, because love is part of the process. & spike's love, whether she admits it or not, is something that buoyed buffy through several seasons & eventually helped her get her shit sort of together.

"Every night I save you," yes. God, it makes me want to cry again.

i think that she admitted it because it was the end for him. he was "done," which meant that buffy could make her statement. and i think that kind of ending or doneness makes someone worthy in ME's eyes.

And I so hated that. For me, that's not love at all. I would rather she'd said nothing at all than to have offered up her love at that precise time. It played as payment. Here, you've earned this, by dying for me. This makes Buffy not a woman, but a goddess figure. Endless worship rewarded with a final moment of beatific love bestowed at the moment of death. That's not love to me.

growing & changing never stops. if you let your monsters become human (& buffy's a monster as well, in her own way), you have to let them continue to grow & change, which means they need to be able to love. in not allowing this for spike, & not really allowing it for buffy, ME failed their own characters and their audience. both buffy & spike deserved better than that, whether they were together or not.

Agree completely. You've put this beautifully. Thanks for coming in and re-energizing this thread. I get all sad and furious and tearful again, just going back over this, but it's a good kind of cathartic.