thedeadlyhook: (Default)
[personal profile] thedeadlyhook
I spent today on a marathon rewatch of Angel Season 5. And funny how watching it as one piece makes it all come together. This was kind of illuminating.


I suppose it's not such a novel observation that Season 5 fits together far better as a whole as opposed to individual episodes. The same could probably be said for every Angel season - although I'd say the first couple of years were more comfortably reliant on standalone eps, "cases" for the gang to solve like a Dark Shadows-flavored X-Files - as well as the last couple of years of Buffy, and given what I've heard about the Mutant Enemy creative process - working backward from the ending sometimes - perhaps that shouldn't be such a surprise. Like a mystery whose ending you've already read, the clues stand out obviously in hindsight, whereas in forward-playing real time they make little sense.

For example, I've come to realize it's a sure sign when episodes don't seem to link up, where dramatic promises aren't followed up on, that these are signposts for plot steerage. The setup for the Illyria arc was full of such moments - sudden shifts in mood and character behaviour that were there strictly for plot purposes. In a more extended example, one of the most confusing segues from BtVS Season 6 was (to my mind) the transition from the grim intensity of "Dead Things" to the damply humorous squib of Buffy's birthday party in "Older and Far Away." Buffy's extreme beatdown of Spike, though a visual and emotional atom bomb, was not actually a setup for any kind of continuing character arc; in fact, it was barely referred to again after the event beyond simple continuity checks (e.g., Spike's black eye and "what are you gonna do, beat me up again" line; Buffy's "I behaved like a monster" admission in "Conversations with Dead People," about her relationship with Spike in general). So then, if the beating scene wasn't there to create any kind of continuing dramatic tension, then it was there for a plot reason. Actually, it was there for two plot reasons. 1) to establish Buffy's own self-hatred by virtually replicating the bodyswitched-Faith-beating-bodyswitched Buffy scene in "Who Are You?" and 2) to set up Spike's soul quest with Buffy's hateful "you don't have a soul!" line. QED.

So, Angel Season 5. Viewed as a whole, it now seems pretty obvious why the episiode-to-episode continuity jarred at the time. The rules had changed, and nobody had told the audience yet. The tone was radically different to the previous season - from ultra-serious drama in S4 we had moved into the realm of dry satire or outright comedy. Moreoever, in Season 5, Angel moved out of the hero's chair and into a much grayer place. Like Season 6 Buffy, Season 5 Angel acted in ways that often didn't fit with what we had come to expect from the titular hero. In that context, Spike's presence in S5 makes sense as part of Angel's arc for the season. It's actually rather entertainingly meta.

Angel vs. Spike
Spike literally takes over the show in Season 5, ironically just as many fans feared he might... and it's actually the whole point of his character arc. Like S4, which was really all about Connor, as a living embodiment of the tragedy of Angel's inability to save even those he loves most, S5 was really all about Spike, and the tragedy of Angel's inability to save himself.

Since the beginning of the AtS series, Angel has been portrayed as working toward redemption, trying to make up for his century-plus of evil by helping others in an approximation of the Protestant ideal of Good Works. The Angel we see in S5, however, is increasingly unsure, morally gray, constantly doubting both himself and his mission. "The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco" can pretty much be taken word for word - Angel spends the entire season worried that he no longer has a hero's heart, and the moral grayness of the Wolfram & Hart deal only makes matters worse. Angel no longers believes a reward is really coming; fighting Spike for the Shanshu and losing merely cements this belief. Even if a reward is out there, he doesn't think he has what it takes to reach it.

So Spike then, in S5, is there for contrast - his appearance in "Just Rewards" (I'm ignoring the TV standard be-sure-to-watch-next-week! lead-in for the closing minutes of "Conviction") is The Hero Returned; promptly after his whirlwhind release from the amulet, we get a flashback of his world-saving immolation in the Hellmouth, a no-bones-about-it heroic moment complete with glowing golden light and chanting orchestral chorus. (Notably, the extent to which this sacrifice had to do with winning Buffy's love is not emphasized; key moments from "Chosen" pertaining to their connection are skipped over.) From there on in, this message is only reinforced - this what a Champion really looks like. Everything out of Spike's mouth is acutely observed, from identifying Wolfram & Hart as "Evil, Incorporated" "digest[ing]" Angel's staff, to blithely blurting out the answers to puzzling cases. Angel tries to solve the ethical puzzles of good and evil intellectually; Spike coasts forward on instinct... and his instincts are almost always right. While Angel plays as impossibly jaded and losing hope, Spike comes off as essentially innocent, a sort of divine fool. He really wants the redemption Angel has given up on.

And in story after story, we see Spike's motives are questioned - selfish? evil? petty? - and in every one of them, our initial negative impression is shown to be an illusion, a trick. He complains, whines, snarks, needles, acts like an ass... but his actions are all positive. He refuses to improve his personal situation if the cost would hurt someone else ("Hellbound"). He refuses to go behind Angel's back when the Crockett-and-Tubbs team of Wes and Gunn ask him to help the helpless under W&H's evil umbrella ("Soul Purpose"). He resists the temptation to take Angel's offer of luxurious sponsorship and stays to help fight the Senior Partners instead ("Shells"). Just as in "Why We Fight," Spike isn't so much a bad guy as he simply likes the look of the coat.

So the message is pretty clear - there is no Angelus-style bad side to this guy. There used to be - and it's implied pretty strongly in ("Destiny") that this was largely due to Angelus's influence - but not anymore. His worst character flaws are all laddish immaturities - boastfulness, restlessness, childish sniping, and a Bill Clinton-esque obsession with sex. (One wonders if the desktop-shagging sequence in "Destiny" wasn't an explicit reference to Clinton, another essentially honest man with a similiar inability to keep his pants zipped.)

Therefore, Season 5 was a little dizzying for the initiated during its broadcast run because Spike virtually replaces Angel in S5 as the actual hero figure for the entire season, starting right off the bat from the second episode, and since the audience expects Angel to be the hero we're taking our cues from... well, there's your problem. In hindsight, however, it's pretty clear what's happening - you can virtually see the transference happen over the course of "Just Rewards." The Angel we saw in "Conviction" was recognizable as the dark hero we'd been following for years - conflicted, yet grimly committed to his mission, certain he'll be able to find a way to use the "weapon" of Wolfram & Hart to do good. That character more or less vanishes the instant Spike appears; Angel becomes irritable, evasive... kind of mean. We find that he hasn't told his team anything about the closing of the Hellmouth, or Spike's soul. Spike accuses Angel of sitting on this info because it made him feel "less special," and he's right. Typically, Angel airs his id out by saying one thing while feeling the exact opposite. He claims (forcefully) not to feel responsible for Spike's death, but later quietly muses that it "should have been me." He bristles at any suggestion that he's threatened by Spike when clearly he is. He insists that he hasn't "turned in his cape and tights" to work at Wolfram & Hart, but in private he's clearly anything but sure. "Soul Purpose" gives us our clearest snapshot ever of Angel's inner conflict - he has performance anxiety of every stripe. Despite the fierce fight he put up in "Destiny," Angel is certain that Spike has him outclassed, that once under the spotlight he'll be shown up for a fraud, empty. "The crowd's turning on ya, sport," as Lorne says.

Then in "Not Fade Away," all this comes to its logical conclusion. Angel gives away the Shanshu he doesn't really believe will ever come to him anyway. He decides his real unique gifts are for ruthlessness and big-picture artistry - the same things that made Angelus legendary. Essentially, Angel turns himself into the "weapon" he originally thought Wolfram & Hart would be, throws himself and his team's into the fray because he's come to believe that only the ends really matter. He takes his team into a huge battle against forces no one else could challenge because, as he tells Number Five, "we can... because we know how." Normal people couldn't do it, but Angel and his followers can. He gives his team assignments to fit their pasts - Wesley, to take on the architect of the mindwipe, a move made necessary by the events set in motion by Wesley's kidnapping of Connor; Gunn, to go back to his roots and take out a gang of vamps; Lorne he sends to kill Lindsey, handing the most morally gray action of the bunch to a demon whose own moral compass has sometimes seemed unclear; and finally, Spike, to rescue a baby... which is, as we saw in "Darla," was the same act that finally separated souled Angel from his failed attempt to recapture the glories of Angelus. Sending Spike on the baby-saving mission is symbolic for Angel - he's passing the torch he himself has given up by deciding he can do more good with Angelus-like ruthlessness than he could by upholding the life of a hero. Pretty darn bleak.

Gunn, Fred, and Why Illyra Didn't Really Fit
Other than that, there isn't much else to observe. Gunn's arc of street-fighter-turned-lawyer "sell out" is an essentially flawless standalone; it's actually the only character arc that's wholly consistent all the way through. The Illyria story that took over the last third of the season doesn't really intersect with this story at all; anything that hurt Fred would have shown Gunn's corruption, his willingness to sacrifice innocent lives for his own purposes and his subsequent remorse. Illyria herself is irrelevant. That Gunn is barely shown interacting with the character of Illyria clinches it for me; she's an intrusion on a story already in progress, not so much a "hole in the world" as a hole in the universe; like a Marvel Comics character punching into a conference room on The Practice, Illyria is a jarring element, akin to discovering that the characters of ER are suddenly treating patients that have been stomped on by Godzilla. One can't say she doesn't belong in the AtS, a supernatural universe that can ultimately sustain anything, but she adds nothing to the Wolfram & Hart plotline. Her storyline, enteraining as it is on some levels, is a self-contained one, airlifted into the existing plot rather like the sarcophogus she appears from. (It's kinda tempting to wonder if we might have gotten more explanation for Lindsey's role in all this had not Illyria been introduced, although since Lindsey's presence already made no sense as early as "You're Welcome," that's probably wishful thinking on my part.)

With Illyria's intro, the season's tone changes from a wry critque on business ethics and the qualities of a hero to a loud, supercharged opera filled with grief and betrayal and agony and madness; it's Titus Andronicus minus the cannibalism (although you could also argue that element was covered by the earlier episode in which Nina is introduced). Wesley goes mad from doomed love, Angel enters his final downward spiral. Fred pretty much vanishes as a character for S5; her continued presence was for four main reasons: to be pretty (as in "Conviction," which included a superfluous inset shot of Fred lounging with her shoes off in the conference room so we could appreciate Amy Acker's legs), smart ("Science Girl," as Spike calls her), sympathetic, and menaced. All four of these elements are in play as early as "Just Rewards" - the scene with Spike in the espisode's closing minutes shows a pretty girl alone in her lab, approached by a guy who seems kinda sinister. This image is repeated again multiple times over the course of the season, notably in "Why We Fight" - Fred is downgraded to endangered damsel/love interest in Season 5, despite her protests in "A Hole in the World." She's objectified, a victim; knocked out, held hostage, taken over by Illyria. She's the one character that everyone likes and can relate to, and thus is the one character that must be destroyed to set all this in motion. Sigh.

It's worth noting here, as an aside, that Fred was a character I used to intensely dislike. After her introduction as a slave girl in the Pylea arc, which was interesting enough, she was used all too often as sort of a multipurpose Mary Sue who I'd felt unduly pressured to like (a similar complaint could be made recently about the character of Andrew) but who I finally grew fond of after seeing her taser Connor in S4. By the end of that season, and the absolutely terrific Jasmine arc, she'd grown to be practically the most interesting character in the series.

In S5, however, Fred is less a character than "every woman... Wonder Woman!" as Lorne yells in "The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco." She's a symbol, a reminder of "the right thing to do" ("Hellbound"). That's something that Angel can't have anymore because S5's arc is about Angel losing his reasons to fight. By the end of the season, Angel has become Lawson, the poor vamp he made during WWII would afterward could never figure out "why we fight." Angel, as someone who's always been given his reasons for fighting from outside sources (Whistler, Buffy, Doyle, Cordelia, the Powers That Be), couldn't keep going without a purpose. And there was no one left to give him one.

So yeah, I see how this fits together now. S5 is about losing hope, about suicidal gestures and futile stabs in the face of destiny. And even more weirdly, it's a comedy.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-23 02:37 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I’ve never been much of an AtS fan. I found I grew bored with Angel/DB once he left BtVS and, except for the crossovers, watched sporadically. I did watch all of the last two seasons – S4 because I knew Faith would be on both series and S5 because of Spike. I very much liked the Jasmine arc but, like most, could have done without C/C. Having had my prejudices against Angel reinforced by his petty behavior in “Chosen,” I went into S5 believing Spike to be the hero and Angel not much of a Champion. I saw nothing throughout the season to dissuade me from my thinking and saw many things to support my view – including a surprising amount of Angelus in Angel. (So much for the idea that Angel and Angelus are completely different persons.) However, I did feel that the writers (with a few exceptions) were trying to undermine Spike at every turn in order to elevate their protagonist. That Spike as the true hero comes through as a cohesive story arc upon your second viewing is unexpected and intriguing.

Although a heroic moment for Spike, I thought it quite sad he was entangled in Angel’s suicide scheme whose purpose and effect I thought dubious at best. Angel (and Wesley and Gunn) may have been ready to die, but was Spike? By the time any of the Angel gang found out about the scheme, it was really impossible not to participate.

Thanks for writing this very interesting overview. You may tempt me to watch some more AtS.

Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-23 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com
You're very welcome. I've actually come to enjoy AtS quite a lot over the past year or so, and I used to very much not care about the series - the first season had more or less bored me on first broadcast, although in review I've become quite fond of it. Angel's character seems, on some levels. that much more interesting to me from the idea that he isn't saved, and in fact willingly decides not to try for it... although given the way the Shanshu prophecy seemed to be set up, it's worth wondering if good intent or worthiness has anything to do with its fulfillment, or if that's just Angel's instinctual interpretation, based on his upbringing, complete with notions of good and evil and heaven and hell...

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-23 07:26 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
if that's just Angel's instinctual interpretation, based on his upbringing, complete with notions of good and evil and heaven and hell...

Ah, yes, good old Catholic angst. Though not one myself, I have many friends and relatives who are, and I grew up in a culture that was primarily Catholic. :)

Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-23 07:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com
That's my upbringing too, so perhaps it gives me a certain take on Angel's head, as someone who relentless despises the "gray area" and longs for the simplicity of black and white.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 05:12 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
who relentless despises the "gray area" and longs for the simplicity of black and white.

Angel seems the perfect spokesman for ME. :)
Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deborahc.livejournal.com
Although a heroic moment for Spike, I thought it quite sad he was entangled in Angel’s suicide scheme whose purpose and effect I thought dubious at best. Angel (and Wesley and Gunn) may have been ready to die, but was Spike? By the time any of the Angel gang found out about the scheme, it was really impossible not to participate.

Yup. Spike had already sacrificed himself to close the hellmouth and thereby save the world. He deserved to live and find some happiness. For him to throw his newly resurrected life away just to cause some minor inconvenience to the Senior Partners was a shameful waste.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 05:07 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
For me, Spike's sacrifice in "Chosen" was much more meaningful than the one in "NFA."
Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sistakaren.livejournal.com
Wait... I completely disagree. To me, it seemed that Spike saw himself as the hero who had lived past his time. He didn't really believe that he should be going out and finding some happiness; he spent the whole season looking for a new purpose. And he found it by going after the Senior Partners with Angel. He was the first one to volunteer, so it's not like he was corralled into it. He wanted to do it, because he thought it was a meaningful thing to do. Good for him.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com
I'd actually have to agree with this viewpoint. While I have certain grumbles about the way the Black Thorn menace was set up (and the plausibility of the idea that taking out the bunch of chucklehead joke villains we were shown would make enough of a difference to the world for Angel to want to thrown his life away on it, as well as those of his teammates - this is the one place the ending really falls down for me), I'd say that Spike volunteering to stay and fight was an important character move. He could have refused - they all could have - but didn't. Given a choice, he chose to believe in Angel and stick by him, and based on Spike's own personal history leading up to that point, I almost can't see anything else he could have done in that moment that wouldn't have looked like a backwards step for the character. This is the end result of the Spike we've seen evolving over the years - a guy who'll pitch in to help stop the apocalypse. So yeah, good for him.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 04:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deborahc.livejournal.com
As to why he did it, you'll get no argument from me. Spike seemed to think his whose resurrected existence was anticlamactic; it's a shame but that's how he seemed to feel.

Maybe I've missed the crucial point, but I just don't see how Angel's suicide mission against the Sr Partners was worth the sacrifice of not just Spike, but of all of them. According to Angel, killing all the members of the Circle of the Black Thorn(was it???) would not stop the the Sr Partners, it would just briefly slow them down. Once they regrouped they'd be back as powerful as ever, but the two great champions who had fought to keep them in check, as well as the rest of the experienced and committed members of Team Angel, would be gone.

I had no problem with Spike's sacrifice at the hellmouth. That meant something. He saved the world. But the mission that ended AtS, I just can't wrap my mind around how that was supposed to be worth their lives. Maybe you can explain it to me.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 11:36 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Not sure exactly where to put this - so I'll just stick it underneath everything. :)

I’m not saying Spike made the wrong choice in supporting Angel, but that he and the others weren’t afforded the opportunity to choose before things were set in motion. Angel presented everyone with a fait accompli – a situation, which one could argue, he himself had brought about through his choices beginning with his deal with W&H for Connor. The result being that, in order to do the right thing, Spike (and the others) had to buy into Angel’s plan. In essence, they were presented with a false choice. Angel and ME never convinced me that there was any objective validity or accomplishment in Angel’s plan, whereas, Spike’s sacrifice in “Chosen” was necessary in order to prevent an apocalypse. It was a worthy sacrifice – this was not. I must agree with deborahc in her statement:
But the mission that ended AtS, I just can't wrap my mind around how that was supposed to be worth their lives.

In addition, I had grave problems with the murder of Drogen. Even though the others didn’t participate in it, the whole enterprise and, thereby, everyone was tainted by it. Lorne’s murder of Lindsey was also problematic. Angel became judge, jury, and executioner and dragged the others down with him. In retrospect, it was an incredibly bleak ending for all concerned. I think the emotional satisfaction of the episode the viewer gains from watching the characters’ actions on their last day obscures this fact.

Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 11:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thedeadlyhook.livejournal.com
I certainly can't argue with any of this. I had similiar reactions to Power Play (http://www.livejournal.com/users/thedeadlyhook/30478.html) at the time, and my initial react to Not Fade Away (http://www.livejournal.com/users/thedeadlyhook/32515.html) was not positive thanks to what I saw as sketchy political parallels and sooper-poor plot setup - not as sloppy as "Chosen," maybe, but not Agatha Christie, either. I have some bitter little nuggets about how women are represented in there as well, plus some grouching about the soullessness issue, that are rather outside the purview of this essay, but there, if you're curious. Nope, the only arc that holds together perfectly for the season's is Gunn's - Angel did not do the smart or virtuous thing in the end - Lorne's walking away proved that, I think - but I think Angel was past thinking he could win the day by either hope or virtue or even strength by then. That he took his team with him in his suicide mission was a tragedy, one that pulled them into his bleak orbit.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-25 01:15 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thanks, I did read these and even commented on the second one. :) Initially, I had a more positive reaction to "NFA" because it was emotionally satisfying in contrast to my feelings about "Chosen." With the passage of time, the philosophy behind it looms large and is difficult to disregard. I still like it more than "Chosen." :)

Gail

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 02:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asta77.livejournal.com
However, I did feel that the writers (with a few exceptions) were trying to undermine Spike at every turn in order to elevate their protagonist

ME had quite the catch 22. The network dictated that Spike be brought onto the show full time. In 'Chosen', via Buffy, ME labels Spike a "champion". Now they are confronted with two souled vampire champions on one show and the prior season has left the 'hero' in a very morally ambiguous place.

I never really thought about it before, but I can see how they would feel compelled to undermine Spike. Suddenly they are confronted with something I don't think they ever wanted to be confronted with. Spike is essentially the same with or without the soul and now is in direct comparison/contrast/competition with Angel who needs his to prevent him from becoming a complete monster. As is, by the end of the season we were seeing there was more of Angelus in Angel than he'd like to believe.

(no subject)

Date: 2004-09-24 04:56 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I never really thought about it before, but I can see how they would feel compelled to undermine Spike.

Once I knew Spike was going to be on AtS, I worried this would happen since he would stand out in direct contrast to Angel. I’m sorry my concerns turned out to be real.

Gail

Profile

thedeadlyhook: (Default)
thedeadlyhook

July 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags